Wenn ihr euch über Elsevier’s Lobbying-Praktiken aufregen oder Elsevier’s letztes Scheitern belächeln wollt, lest das Interview von Richard Poynder mit Claudio Aspesi und Peter Suber’s neuesten Newsletter. Im folgenden einige Zitate von Aspesi, einem Finanzanalysten:

the scholarly journal system is being buffeted by three overlapping trends: “a long term unsustainable trend, a cyclical funding crisis and a more tough minded and analytical community of librarians.”

I believe their plan B (of Elsevier) is actually to try to shift spending decisions away from academic libraries and into research labs and departments.

Aspesi weiß, was Elsevier in die Knie zwingen könnte:

What would change that is a visible number of editorial board resignations. This would paralyze journals, and — if it proved impossible to replace the people leaving — could lead to shut downs. Even if the number of journals initially affected was small, the news would have a profound impact on the company. The stock market is a powerful mechanism to discount the future value of even small events, and if investors started to abandon the stock, the company would have to rethink its approach.

Nachsatz: “Academic publishers have become the enemies of science” wird überall zitiert, selbst in The Lancet (was für die editorielle Unabhängigkeit von Elsevierzeitschriften von Elsevier sprechen würde).


Comments are closed.

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind