• Home
  • Archiv/Kategorien
  • Blogiquette
  • Blogroll/Links
  • Statistik

medinfo

Informationen aus Medizin, Bibliothek und Fachpresse

RSS
Einträge
Kommentare

BiomedCentral: Yale steigt aus

6. August 2007 by ob | Kategorien: From other blogs

Presserklärung der dortigen Medizinbibliothek:

After careful consideration, the Cushing/Whitney Medical and Kline Science Libraries have decided to end their support for BioMed Central’s Open Access publishing effort. The libraries previously covered 100% of the author page charges which allowed these papers to be made freely available worldwide via the Internet at time of publication. This experiment in Open Access publishing has proved unsustainable. The libraries’ support will continue for all Yale-authored articles currently in submission to BioMed Central as of July 27, 2007.

The libraries’ BioMedCentral membership represented an opportunity to test the technical feasibility and the business model of this OA publisher. While the technology proved acceptable, the business model failed to provide a viable long-term revenue base built upon logical and scalable options. Instead, BioMedCentral has asked libraries for larger and larger contributions to subsidize their activities. Starting with 2005, BioMed Central page charges cost the libraries $4,658, comparable to a single biomedicine journal subscription. The cost of page charges for 2006 then jumped to $31,625. The page charges have continued to soar in 2007 with the libraries charged $29,635 through June 2007, with $34,965 in potential additional page charges in submission….

We believe in the widest possible access to scholarly research supported by workable business models and should BioMedCentral develop a viable economic model which allows them to more equitably share costs across all interested stakeholders, we would consider renewing our financial support….

Tja, kann ich alles nur unterschrieben … bei uns läuft es auch nur weiter, weil wir nicht so viele Accepted Papers haben. [via Peter Suber]

No tags for this post.

Related posts

  • No related posts.

Nutzung: 1,025 Aufrufe

Translations:

   

Comments are closed.

  • Polls

      Wo geht's lang?
      (Wo sollte es lang gehen?)

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...
  • Letzte Kommentare

    • Wer sorgt für die Knowlegde Translation?
      • Daniel Nowak: Antes sorgt sich um...
    • Geld durch Blogbeiträge?
      • ob: Danke für den Tipp. Man kann...
      • Jürgen Plieninger: Lieber Oliver,...
    • Internet Cool Tools for Physicians (Taschenbuch)
      • ob: 26,70 Euro für 154 Seiten - das...
      • Martin: bissel teuer :-(
    • Nobelpreisverleihung an Harald zur Hausen
      • kg: Wieso man sich dort nicht die...
      • ob: Schöne Liste! Könnte man diese...
    • Open Access, Ölindustrie und Obama
      • Cherubino: The End of Peer Review and...
  • Top-Beiträge

    • Inetbibtagung 2008 in Würzburg: Testbed für Konferenzblogging - 8,716 Views
    • Health Library 2.0 - 6,735 Views
    • Beitrag Nr. 2000 in medinfo - 6,428 Views
    • Was ist Web 2.0? - 6,062 Views
    • Wissenschaft & Betrug - 5,407 Views
    • Abstimmung: Würden Sie an Feiertagen öffnen? - 5,344 Views
    • Heft 3/2005 von MEDIZIN - BIBLIOTHEK - INFORMATION unter gms online - 5,313 Views
    • BioMed Central und Unabhängigkeit der Editoren - 5,240 Views
    • Die Rangliste der gefährlichsten Drogen - 4,971 Views
    • Impressum - 3,823 Views
  • Dankeschön

    medinfo.netbib.de wird gehosted auf einem Server der Unibibliothek Dortmund. Vielen Dank für den Support an das DV-Team!!
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Impressum
    • Register
    • Valid XHTML
    • XFN
    • WordPress
    • medlib-blogs.png
  Creative Commons-Lizenzvertrag
Dieser Inhalt ist unter einer Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert.

medinfo © 2009 All Rights Reserved.

Free WordPress Themes | Fresh WordPress Themes